Heatbud logo
TOP CHARTS
BLOG POSTS
SEARCH
HELP CENTER
LOGIN / SIGNUP
Lifestyle Visit zone home page
Open Zone
Favorite
< Previous Post
> Next Post
Create Post in this Zone
Create a new Zone
MY ZONES
Login to favorite zones.
TOP ZONES+
  • Business
       
  • MarketResearch
       
  • Analytical Market Research Report
       
  • Market ResearchNest
       
  • Trendy Women Tops That Will Help You To Improve
       
  • My Zone
       
  • Health
       
  • Politics
       
  • eMarketOrg.com
       
  • College
       
  • Industry Research Forcast
       
  • Market Research Reports
       
  • Chemical
       
  • Yada Yada Yada
       
  • Singing Bowls
       
  • The Choice Within Me
       
  • Market Research Report
       
  • AlgoroReports
       
  • American Food
       
  • Beauty & Fashion
       
  • Social Issues
       
  • Fashion Stylist
       
  • Apps & Gadgets
       
  • What Needs to be Said
       
  • Car Accessories
       
Join the Social Blogging revolution!
*** This post has not yet been published. ***
Genuine Hackers Break Into Voting Machines
by
Share Blog Post by URL Like Heatbud on Facebook
UNIQUE VIEWS   +   UP VOTES Vote Up   -   DOWN VOTES Vote Down   +   COMMENTS Comments   =   HEAT INDEX What is Heat Index?

Although there is no evidence that the government is deliberately trying to compromise the election, some people believe that there may be genuine hackers who break into voting machines. Regardless of the level of concern, the lack of disclosure may lead to false accusations and conspiracy theories, especially from losing candidates. But revealing the details of the hack would also make it easier for hackers to copy the method. The lack of disclosure will only lead to more attacks, and the damage could be worse if it were attributed to the government.

The attack could begin by attacking county and state election computers, which are supposed to be non-networked. The malware may cause the machines to secretly dial any number without alerting authorities, and it could even change the system logs to wipe out evidence of phone calls made. This malicious software can then connect to voting machines and subvert election results. This malware is also difficult to detect. In many states, only 5 percent of voting machines are networked.

Even if there were no way to hack election computers, an attacker with the right skills could penetrate voting machines through a modem and overwrite voting software and other systems. It would take mere minutes for an attacker to do so, and the infection could be passed onto the voting machines when officials program future elections. In some states, the voting technology is proprietary, and only forensic auditors can detect malicious software. Further, malicious software might be completely removed after election day.

Those responsible for elections might decide to force a fraudulent election or deny funding to voting systems. These criminals could even leak administrators' passwords to gain access to the machines. The DEF CON conference encourages paranoia. Hackers who attend the conference were tasked with trying out voting machines. One of the hackers successfully broke into a Diebold machine in Illinois, one of the many states where voting machines are in use. The hacker used no special tools to gain administrator-level access to the voting machine, and the only sign of an attack was a video published on CNN.

A hacker with knowledge of election Hire a hacker   can create a story to manipulate voters' minds, according to an exhibit at the 2016 DEFCON conference. The exhibit included decommissioned and operational election equipment. An 11-year-old girl recently hacked the Florida secretary of state's website and changed election results in 10 minutes. These findings are a warning to election officials to be extra careful when securing their voting equipment.

If the government does not implement measures to combat election hacking, then the resulting scandals could be even worse. While the majority of elections are secure and fair, a single hacker can still sway an election. It all depends on whether the hacker is a genuine hacker. It is possible that a malicious actor has already hacked a voting machine, causing an upset election. If that is the case, the affected election can be thrown into chaos.

Hackers are now targeting election systems, including e-voting machines. They have seen what lies inside electronic voting's digital closet and have mastered the techniques of breaking into it. In the past few months, hackers have demonstrated that these voting machines are not as secure as iPhones, but they still offer a way to influence a vote. It is not yet clear who would be behind these attacks, but it's worth noting that many voting machines now have remote access software that can be hacked.

One way to combat election hacking is to install a modem in the voting machine. These devices can be used by attackers to intercept unofficial election results, alter the voting software, and steal votes. There are many ways to do this, and they are not limited to hacking computer systems. In fact, some actors use disinformation campaigns to influence voter behavior, often referred to as "social hacking."

As a result of Halderman's actions, the state has instituted stricter voter ID requirements and banned the collection of multiple absentee ballots. Although these measures have helped Georgia vote without incident, they are still not sufficient in protecting against election hacking. Further, the state of Michigan is also considering installing paper ballots as a means of defence against hackers. For instance, Halderman spearheaded a campaign that would encourage the state to count a statistically valid number of paper ballots, including ballots from voting machines.

 
Comments:
  
No comments yet.
 
Post a Comment:

 
Related Posts:
 
 
By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. GOT IT